
(got english story back! will type up later today or tomorrow after schl!)
the creating connections session today infuriated me and evoked emotions i have never experienced before.
whilst in progress of the pirate hat activity, i hear punching and shoving. i turn around and two kids, lets call them c and s, were in a tangle. it was obvious to me in a matter of a second, that s was struggling to get away without any form of retaliation (not even shoving or pushing back, just striving to free himself), whilst c was determined on hurting this guy. (yes, it was two boys. why are you not surprised?) you can say the 6 of us year 10s there were being irresponsible, not being able to control the year 7s, but it all happened too fast. and where was miss macqueen!
let me say that the pirate hat activity does not outline anything about acting like pirates. i quickly get in between to push the two apart and failed, so grabbed onto c, as s was basically under him by now, and pulled him away. i separated them, standing in between, telling them to calm down before i asked to hear their sides of the stories, because such actions could only stem from something. and i wanted to know what that something was for them to seem such actions as necessary! they were only year 7s after all, and were close friends!
this was what both of them agreed on: c had used masking tape to tape s's bag to the railings. after s found it hard to remove from the railings, he took c's bag and placed it in a toilet cubicle, touching the toilet. c found his bag there. c agreed that he started the fight. he agreed that there was kicking, pushing and punching s's head (rather strong punching i must say, i heard that sound that your knuckles would make against a wooden table). to be honest, my interpretation of the story would be c did it as a joke to begin with. s decided to retaliate, but all in the name of good fun as they were best friends after all! c didnt like it and started a fight, but s did not fight back, he simply tried to walk away.
am i being bias to have taken s's side? i dont like people with that sort of inflated ego that states
i can mess with you all i want but you touch me and you're dead. it angered me to the core, after seeing and hearing the story, and witnessing the expression on s's face. jordan kerr calls them over, and c denies all the violence. "i didnt punch him" and the moment he said that, i swear, i had enough anger to did exactly what he did to s, but thank god for self control. mitchell was angry too, as we both instantly said, "c we saw you do it". jordan kerr asked him, "why did you tape his bag to the ceiling?" c says, "it was funny." jordan asks, "would it be funny if someone did it to your bag?" c says, "yes." contradictory or what, the guy lashed out and nearly knocked the brains out of the poor boy! miss macqueen, oh where the hell was she, decides to turn up five minutes later after the bell went. so much for supervision. we tell her the story, seeking some sort of separation for future creating connection groups.
it makes me feel horrible that i cant prove the bullying on c's part. s shouldnt have touched c's bag, but i understand why, they were friends, it was seen as fun. s saw it as fun when c did it, why couldnt c see it as 'fun' when it was done to him? this wasnt the first time that this sort of behaviour had been exhibited by c, ive seen it before. i wonder who else he has punched four times in the head in the span of three seconds. i went to japanese feeling fiery, and at the same time, hopeless. it just made me want to be a lawyer that much more. imagine how passionate i would feel though, when i get a case that isnt just some kid punching another over a location of a bag.
onto something a bit historical.
julia gillard. i dont like her. i know its the first female prime minister, i should be whoo so happy yay lets throw a party. but no! just no! stupid woman, we didnt vote her in! she doesnt deserve to be there. i dont know anything about politics.. but how dare she turn on kevin rudd! (i dont know if she did, but.. bitch! rofl!) dont get me wrong, im not anti feminist or anything, its great to have female prime minsters but why did it have to be herrrrrrrrrr. i dont like change at all. my muscles keep fidgeting knowing that they are under the prime ministerism of julia gillard.
subject selection forms due tomorrow and i am still umm-ing and ah-ing. talked to miss blake today, and now am tempted to do agriculture instead of biology. she was right though, our main objective should be to get a high as possible atar, not worrying about course requirements and everything else
too much. making another trip to fairfield library later to acquire a few hsc text books, then i will be making my final decisions. (so tempted to do chemistry and agriculture now after flipping through text books. doing biology by itself would be useless, like that person brought to my attention on formspring.)
good luck guys. we can do this. ♥
edit 8:18pm sitting here with text books: two biology ones, a modern history one, a pdhpe one, a chemistry one and a legal studies one. gonna read and see which one i vomit over first and that one definitely is not gonna be one of my choices.
Labels: creating connections, subject selection